4.7 Article

Quantitative MR imaging of two-pool magnetization transfer model parameters in myelin mutant shaking pup

Journal

NEUROIMAGE
Volume 62, Issue 3, Pages 1390-1398

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.077

Keywords

Quantitative magnetization transfer; Cross-relaxation imaging; White matter; Myelin; Animal models; Relaxometry

Funding

  1. NIH NINDS [R01NS050466, R01NS065034]
  2. National Multiple Sclerosis Society [TR-3761]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Magnetization transfer (MT) imaging quantitatively assesses cerebral white matter disease through its sensitivity to macromolecule-bound protons including those associated with myelin proteins and lipid bilayers. However, traditional MT contrast measured by the MT ratio (MTR) lacks pathologic specificity as demyelination, axon loss, inflammation and edema all impact MTR, directly and/or indirectly through multiple covariances among imaging parameters (particularly MTR with T-1) and tissue features (e.g. axon loss with demyelination). In this study, more complex modeling of MT phenomena (quantitative MT or qMT) was applied to a less complex disease model (the myelin mutant shaking [sh] pup, featuring hypomyelination but neither inflammation nor axon loss) in order to eliminate the covariances on both sides of the MR-pathology equation and characterize these important relationships free from the usual confounds. qMT measurements were acquired longitudinally in 6 sh pups and 4 age-matched controls ranging from 3 to 21 months of age and compared with histology. The qMT parameter, bound pool fraction (f), was the most distinctive between diseased and control animals; both f and longitudinal relaxation rate R-1 tracked myelination with normal aging, whereas MFR did not-presumably owing to counterbalancing MT and R-1 effects. qMT imaging provides a more accurate and potentially more specific non-invasive tissue characterization. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available