4.7 Article

Relationships between cognitive function and frontal grey matter volumes and thickness in middle aged and early old-aged adults: The PATH Through Life Study

Journal

NEUROIMAGE
Volume 55, Issue 3, Pages 845-855

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.015

Keywords

Frontal cortex; Cognitive aging; MRI

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia Unit [973302, 179805, 157125]
  2. Australian Rotary Health Research Fund
  3. Australian Brewers Foundation
  4. National Computational Infrastructure
  5. NHMRC [471501, 366756]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study examined the relationship of lateral frontal cortical volume and thickness with cognitive function in two samples of healthy middle aged (MA, 44-48 years old) and early old-age (OA, 64-68 years old) adults. T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging scans were acquired in 400 MA and 397 OA adults from respective random community samples. Cortical volumes and thickness were measured with a surface-based segmentation procedure (http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu). Volumes of lateral frontal grey matter were found to be significantly lower for OA than MA. Structure-function relationships were investigated using path analyses. In OA, smaller lateral frontal volumes were associated with better episodic memory (EM) (p < 0.012, B = -0.117), and Symbol-Digit Modalities Test (SDM) (p < 0.031, B = -0.118) performance. Smaller frontal cortical thickness was also associated with better EM (p < 0.01) and SDM (p < 0.01) performance in OA. However, in MA greater cortical thickness was associated with better EM and (p < 0.01) and reaction time (RT) (p < 0.01). OA cohort showed significant positive correlations between Total Brain Volume and SDM, Digit-Backwards span and RT. Possible explanations and implications of the relationships in the context of cognitive aging in healthy adults, and limitations of cross-sectional research are discussed. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available