4.4 Article

Citalopram for pediatric functional abdominal pain: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial

Journal

NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY
Volume 26, Issue 11, Pages 1642-1650

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nmo.12444

Keywords

abdominal pain; antidepressive agents; child; randomized controlled trial; serotonin reuptake inhibitors

Funding

  1. Isfahan University of Medical Sciences [391299]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundAntidepressants are effective in adults with pain-related functional gastrointestinal disorders. We investigated the effectiveness of citalopram in the treatment of childhood functional abdominal pain (FAP). MethodsChildren with FAP, based on the Rome III criteria (n=115, aged 6-18years), were randomized to receive either citalopram 20mg/day or placebo for 4weeks. Treatment response was defined as 2 point reduction in the 6-point Faces pain rating scale or no pain'. Depression, anxiety, somatization, and physician-rated global severity and improvement were also evaluated. Patients were followed up for 8weeks after medication period. Key ResultsEighty-six patients completed the medication (43 in each group). Response rate in the citalopram and placebo groups based on per-protocol (intention-to-treat) analysis was 55.8% (40.6%) and 39.5% (30.3%) at week 4 (p=0.097 [0.169]) and 72.0% (52.5%) and 53.4% (41.0%) at week 12 (p=0.059 [0.148]), respectively. In per-protocol analysis, more reduction was observed in pain (F=3.84, p=0.024) and global severity scores (F=4.12, p=0.021) in the citalopram group compared with the placebo group over the study period. Such differences were not present in the intention-to-treat analysis. No difference was found between the two groups regarding change in depression, anxiety, or somatization score over the study. Conclusions & InferencesOverall, we found a trend toward the effectiveness of citalopram in the treatment of children with FAP. Trials with longer treatment duration in larger samples of patients are required in this regard.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available