4.2 Article

Desmoplakin as a Potential Candidate for Cerebrospinal Fluid Marker to Rule Out 14-3-3 False Positive Rates in Sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease Differential Diagnosis

Journal

NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASES
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages 139-144

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000334499

Keywords

CSF marker; Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease; Desmoplakin; 14-3-3; Tau

Funding

  1. European Commission [KBBE-2007-2-4-06]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background:The detection of a 14-3-3 elevated level in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is a part of the diagnostic criteria for probable sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (sCJD), as defined by the WHO. However, some pathological conditions associated with acute neuronal damage may result in a positive 14-3-3 test and thereby reduce test specificity in sCJD. Objective: Desmoplakin has been previously identified as up-regulated CSF protein in sCJD and these studies aimed to investigate its diagnostic utility and compare it with two known CSF markers, 14-3-3 and tau. Methods and Results: We tested CSF levels of 14-3-3, tau and desmoplakin in 58 sCJD patients and 81 control patients including 45 cases with an elevated 14-3-3 level due to other disease than sCJD. We detected an elevated CSF level of desmoplakin in 78% of the sCJD patients, while 14-3-3 (88%) and tau (91%) showed a higher positive rate. However, the false positive rate of newly tested desmoplakin was significantly lower in comparison to 14-3-3 and tau, and it accounted for only 11% versus 56% and 35%, respectively. Further reduction of false positive rates was achieved by combination of elevated tau level with a positive desmoplakin test. Moreover, in the non-sCJD group, desmoplakin level did not correlate with the level of both above-mentioned CSF markers, whereas a clear correlation was observed in the sCJD group. Conclusion: Desmoplakin showed a low positive rate accompanied by a very low false positive rate. Thus, we conclude that desmoplakin is a promising candidate for supportive CSF marker to rule out 14-3-3 false positive cases in sCJD differential diagnosis. Copyright (C) 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available