4.2 Article

Adaptive Alternative Splicing Correlates with Less Environmental Risk of Parkinsonism

Journal

NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASES
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages 87-98

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000331328

Keywords

Acetylcholinesterase; Alternative splicing; Animal models; Brain; Parkinson's disease

Funding

  1. European Community's Network of Excellence [LSH-2004-1.1.5-3]
  2. ISF-MORASHA [399/07]
  3. Rosetrees Foundation
  4. Hebrew University
  5. Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Sciences (ELSC)
  6. Gatsby Foundation
  7. Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background/Objective: Environmental exposure to anti-acetylcholinesterases (AChEs) aggravates the risk of Parkinsonism due to currently unclear mechanism(s). We explored the possibility that the brain's capacity to induce a widespread adaptive alternative splicing response to such exposure may be involved. Methods: Following exposure to the dopaminergic neurotoxin 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP), brain region transcriptome profiles were tested. Results: Changes in transcript profiles, alternative splicing patterns and splicing-related gene categories were identified. Engineered mice over-expressing the protective AChE-R splice variant showed less total changes but more splicing-related ones than hypersensitive AChE-S over-expressors with similarly increased hydrolytic activities. Following MPTP exposure, the substantia nigra and prefrontal cortex (PFC) of both strains showed a nuclear increase in the splicing factor ASF/SF2 protein. Furthermore, intravenous injection with highly purified recombinant human AChE-R changed transcript profiles in the striatum. Conclusions: Our findings are compatible with the working hypothesis that inherited or acquired alternative splicing deficits may promote parkinsonism, and we propose adaptive alternative splicing as a strategy for attenuating its progression. Copyright (C) 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available