4.6 Article

FCANN:: A new approach for extraction and representation of knowledge from ANN trained via Formal Concept Analysis

Journal

NEUROCOMPUTING
Volume 71, Issue 13-15, Pages 2670-2684

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2007.09.025

Keywords

rule extraction from neural networks; formal concept analysis; machine learning

Funding

  1. National Research Council CNPq-Brazil
  2. CT-INFO/MCT/CNPq [031/2004]
  3. [506512/2004-5]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nowadays, Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) are being widely used in the representation of different systems and physics processes. Once trained, the networks are capable of dealing with operational conditions not seen during the training process, keeping tolerable errors in their responses. However, humans cannot assimilate the knowledge kept by those networks, since such implicit knowledge is difficult to be extracted. In this work, Formal Concept Analysis (FCA) is being used in order to extract and represent knowledge from previously trained ANN. The new FCANN approach permits to obtain a complete canonical base, non-redundant and with minimum implications, which qualitatively describes the process being studied. The approach proposed has a sequence of steps such as the generation of a synthetic dataset. The variation of data number per parameter and the discretization interval number are adjustment factors to obtain more representative rules without the necessity of retraining the network. The FCANN method is not a classifier itself as other methods for rule extraction; this approach can be used to describe and understand the relationship among the process parameters through implication rules. Comparisons of FCANN with C4.5 and TREPAN algorithms are made to show its features and efficacy. Applications of the FCANN method for real world problems are presented as case studies. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available