4.5 Article

Involvement of lysosomes in the early stages of axon degeneration

Journal

NEUROCHEMISTRY INTERNATIONAL
Volume 56, Issue 3, Pages 516-521

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuint.2009.12.012

Keywords

Lysosomal disruption; Mitochondrial membrane potential; Axon degeneration; Wld(S); Lysosomal inhibitors

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30825009, 30570558, 30970619]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2009CB918403, 2007CB914501]
  3. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [08QH1402600]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Axon degeneration is a common hallmark of many neurodegenerative diseases, and the underlying mechanism remains largely unknown. Lysosomes are involved in some neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease. Whether lysosomes are involved in axon degeneration is yet to be elucidated. In this study, we found only about 10% lysosomes remained in axons of cultured superior cervical ganglia (SCGs) after transection for 4 h when stained with LysoTracker. Furthermore, we found that lysosomal disruption occurred earlier than morphological changes and loss of mitochondrial membrane potential. In addition. the well-known axon-protective protein WldS delayed injury-induced axon degeneration from both morphological changes and lysosomal disruption. Lysosomal inhibitors including chloroquine and ammonium chloride induced axon degeneration in cultured SCGs, and Wld(S) also slowed down the axon degeneration induced by lysosomal inhibitors. All these data suggest that lysosomal disruption is an early marker of axon degeneration, and inhibition of lysosome induces axon degeneration in a Wld(S)-protectable way. Thus, maintenance of normal lysosomal function might be an important approach to delay axon degeneration in neurodegenerative diseases. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available