4.6 Article

Role of enhanced solar radiation for degradation of triazophos pesticide in soil matrix

Journal

SOLAR ENERGY
Volume 120, Issue -, Pages 494-504

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2015.07.050

Keywords

Degradation; Enhanced solar irradiation; Sunlight flux density; Triazophos

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The fate of pesticide in soil is decided by its persistence and degradation, and is very important for assessing its stability and safety. The present work studies the role of enhanced solar radiation and soil moisture on degradation of triazophos in soil. The results showed that degradation followed first order kinetics (biphasic) with half life t(1/2) varying significantly (2-87 days) under different soil moisture and light conditions. As compared to dry and field capacity soil, the degradation was faster in submerged soil. The degradation was maximum in UV light (t(1/2) 2.01 +/- 0.02 days) followed by enhanced sunlight (two times the normal sunlight flux density, t(1/2) 2.95 +/- 0.065 days), normal sunlight (t(1/2) 8.22 +/- 0.24 days) and dark conditions (t(1/2) 36.7 +/- 0.86 days). The degradation efficiency was improved from 70.64 +/- 3.1% to 92.2 +/- 1.6% when the intensity of normal solar radiation was doubled. In the submerged soil, almost complete degradation of the pesticide occurred without the formation of any intermediate product under enhanced solar conditions whereas intermediate degradation product was observed when exposed to UV light. The promising findings offer the use of enhanced solar radiation as a greener and cost effective technique for degradation of pesticide. Furthermore, exposure of the thin film of triazophos to different light conditions revealed that the pesticide was photo labile and was highly unstable under UV light (t(1/2) 2.92 +/- 0.09 days), followed by enhanced sunlight (t(1/2) 3.89 +/- 0.46 days), normal sunlight and dark conditions. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available