4.6 Article

Prescription of potentially inappropriate medications to elderly hemodialysis patients: prevalence and predictors

Journal

NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages 498-505

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfu070

Keywords

adverse drug events; DOPPS; elderly patients; hemodialysis; potentially inappropriate medication

Funding

  1. Amgen, Inc.
  2. Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In elderly hemodialysis (HD) patients, the risk of medication-related problems is particularly high. Thus, certain medications should generally not be prescribed to those patients. The Beers criteria for potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) have been publicized. Still, with regard to elderly HD patients, the prevalence and risk factors for prescription of PIMs are unknown. This was a cross-sectional study of data from the Japan Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (2002-08). Patients were included if they were 65 years old or older and were currently receiving HD treatment at a hospital or clinic. We counted the number of patients who were prescribed at least one PIM, as defined by the modified Beers criteria. We used multiple logistic regression analysis to determine which patient characteristics and facility characteristics were associated with prescription of PIMs. Data from 1367 elderly patients were analyzed. More than half of the patients (57%) had been prescribed a PIM. The three most frequently prescribed PIMs were H2 blockers (33%), antiplatelet agents (19%) and alpha-blockers (13%). PIM prescriptions were less likely at facilities that conducted multidisciplinary rounds {adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 0.67 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.48-0.93]} and at teaching hospitals [AOR: 0.59 (95% CI, 0.39-0.90)]. PIM prescriptions are more likely if more than one physician has clearance to alter the HD regimen [AOR: 1.65 (95% CI, 1.12-2.44)]. PIMs were prescribed to many elderly HD patients in Japan. Nephrologists should become more aware of PIMs. Multidisciplinary rounds could benefit patients by reducing the prescription of PIMs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available