4.1 Article

Short-Term Response of Soil Enzyme Activity and Soil Respiration to Repeated Carbon Nanotubes Exposure

Journal

SOIL & SEDIMENT CONTAMINATION
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages 250-261

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15320383.2015.948611

Keywords

repeated contamination; soil incubation; Nanomaterial; soil biochemical property

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41101530, 31270586, 41201318]
  2. International Cooperative Project of Shandong Province [2012GHZ21702]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Forest and Soil Ecology [LFSE2014-07]
  4. Shandong Province Higher Educational Science and Technology Program [J11LB17]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nanomaterials such as single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) and multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) may repeatedly enter the soil environment with unknown adverse consequences. To provide the information on the effects of repeated exposure of CNTs, we determined the response of soil enzyme activity and soil basal respiration (SBR) through a two-week incubation of farmland soil repeatedly treated with different concentrations of CNTs (100, 200, 500mg kg(-1) for SWCNTs and 100, 500, 1000mg Kg(-1) for MWCNTs). The activities of catalase, alkaline phosphatase, and invertase and SBR were measured after one- and two-time treatments. The repeated contamination of SWCNTs and MWCNTs repressed the activity of alkaline phosphatase and invertase in the 14-day incubation. Alkaline phosphatase and invertase were more sensitive indicators of CNTs' contamination than catalase and soil basal respiration. High concentration of the SWCNTs stimulated SBR while the lower concentration suppressed SBR. The recurred exposure of SWCNTs and MWCNTs repressed the activity of catalase and invertase. The obtained results indicated that the soil microorganisms were suppressed under repeated pollution, as suggested by the same suppressed response of SBR between SWCNTs and MWCNTs treatment, except for the concentration of 500mg kg(-1).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available