4.6 Article

Vitamin D status and mortality in chronic kidney disease

Journal

NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 26, Issue 11, Pages 3603-3609

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfr076

Keywords

death; mortality; prospective; renal; vitamin D

Funding

  1. LURIC [LSHM-CT-2004-503485]
  2. European Union [201668]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Vitamin D deficiency is found in the majority of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and may contribute to various chronic diseases. Current guidelines suggest correcting reduced 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH) D] concentrations in CKD patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 mL/min/1.73m(2). Whether low 25(OH) D levels in these patients are associated with higher mortality is unclear. This issue was addressed in the present work. Methods. We examined 444 patients with eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73m(2) from the Ludwigshafen Risk and Cardiovascular Health Study. This prospective cohort study includes Caucasian patients without primary kidney disease who were routinely referred to coronary angiography at baseline (1997-2000). Results. During a median follow-up time of 9.4 years, 227 patients died including 159 deaths from cardiovascular causes. Multivariate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) (with 95% confidence intervals) in severely vitamin D-deficient [25(OH) D < 10 ng/mL] compared to vitamin D-sufficient patients [25(OH) D >= 30 ng/mL] were 3.79 (1.71-8.43) for all-cause and 5.61 (1.89-16.6) for cardiovascular mortality. Adjusted HRs per 10 ng/mL increase in 25(OH) D levels were 0.63 (0.50-0.79) for all-cause and 0.59 (0.45-0.79) for cardiovascular mortality. There was no significant interaction with parathyroid hormone concentrations. Conclusions. Low 25(OH) D levels are associated with increased all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in CKD patients. These findings support suggestions to correct vitamin D deficiency, but whether vitamin D supplementation improves survival remains to be proven in randomized controlled trials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available