4.6 Article

Oral supplementation with sulodexide inhibits neo-angiogenesis in a rat model of peritoneal perfusion

Journal

NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages 548-556

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfr370

Keywords

angiogenesis; fibrosis; peritoneal dialysis; peritoneal membrane; sulodexide

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is associated with functional and morphological alterations of the peritoneal membrane (PM). It is hypothesized that vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) plays a role in this process. Sulodexide is a glycosaminoglycan with effects on vascular biology. Therefore, the impact of oral sulodexide on PM function and morphology in a rat model of peritoneal perfusion was evaluated. Rats received 10 mL peritoneal dialysate fluid (PDF) twice daily via a tunnelled PD catheter. The test-PD group (Sul) received 15 mg/kg/day oral sulodexide versus none in the control-PD group (Con). A third group received no PDF (Sham). After 12 weeks, a peritoneal equilibration test was performed and the PM was sampled. Neo-angiogenesis was evaluated using immunostaining with von Willebrand, and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) using co-localization of cytokeratin and alpha-smooth muscle actin. VEGF was determined in the dialysate by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. PD induced loss of ultrafiltration, also in the sulodexide group. Creatinine and glucose transport were better preserved, and sodium dip was more pronounced in the sulodexide group versus control. Submesothelial thickness, neo-angiogenesis and EMT were more pronounced in the Con versus Sul versus Sham group. VEGF in the dialysate, corrected for diffusion was higher in Con and Sul versus Sham. Oral sulodexide administration diminishes neo-vascularization, submesothelial thickening and EMT induced by exposure to PDF in a rat model. As there was no difference in VEGF at the protein level in the dialysate, we hypothesize that oral sulodexide inhibits VEGF locally by binding.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available