4.6 Article

Beta-blockers for coronary heart disease in chronic kidney disease

Journal

NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages 2274-2279

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfm950

Keywords

cardiovascular mortality; chronic kidney disease; beta-blockers

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Limited data exist on whether the cardioprotective benefit of beta-blockers is modified by the presence of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Methods. A post hoc analysis of the data from the Bezafibrate Infarction Prevention (BIP) study was performed. CKD was defined according to the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2). The Cox proportional hazard model, including adjustment for propensity score, was used to estimate the hazard ratios (HR) for the composite endpoint combining acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or sudden cardiac death (SCD). Results. In this cohort of 3075 coronary heart disease (CHD) patients, 568 (18.5%) had CKD and 1185 (38.5%) were treated with beta-blockers. A total of 245 (43.1%) CKD patients received beta-blockers at baseline. The mean (+/- SD) estimated GFR in the CKD and non-CKD subgroups was 55 (+/- 4) and 73 (+/- 9) mL/min/1.73 m(2), respectively. After a median follow-up of 6.2 years, the crude incidence rates of AMI or SCD/1000 person years (PY) were 25.6, 21.9, 34.6 and 27.5 for the beta-blockers-/CKD-, beta-blockers+/CKD-, beta-blockers-/CKD+ and beta-blockers+/CKD+ groups, respectively. Compared to patients with beta-blockers-/CKD-, the adjusted HR of AMI or SCD was 0.87 (90% CI 0.71-1.06) for the beta-blockers+/CKD-, 1.35 (90% CI 1.05-1.73) for the beta-blockers-/CKD+ and 1.06 (90% CI 0.76-1.46) for the beta-blockers+/CKD+. Conclusions. These analyses suggest that the use of beta-blockers is associated with a reduction in event risk in patients with CHD regardless of the presence or absence of CKD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available