4.3 Article

Medical costs associated with chronic kidney disease progression in an Asian population with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Journal

NEPHROLOGY
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages 534-541

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nep.13478

Keywords

costs; kidney disease; type 2 diabetes mellitus

Funding

  1. Alexandra Health Small Innovation Grant [AHPL SIGII/11001, SIG/11029, SIG/12024]
  2. Alexandra Health Science-Translational and Applied Research 1 [(STAR 1)/16102]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim We aim to examine difference in incremental direct medical costs between non-progressive and progressive chronic kidney disease (CKD) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in Singapore. Methods This was a prospective study on 676 patients with T2DM attending a diabetes centre in a regional hospital. Annual direct medical costs were extracted from the administrative database. Ordinary least squares regression was used to estimate contribution of CKD progression to annual costs, adjusting for demographics and baseline clinical covariates. Results Over mean follow-up period of 2.8 +/- 0.4 years, 266 (39.3%) had CKD progression. The excess total follow-up medical costs from baseline was S$4243 higher in progressors compared to non-progressors (P = 0.002). The mean cost differential between the two groups increased from S$2799 in Stages G1-G2 to S$11180 in Stage G4. Inpatient cost accounted for 63.4% of total cost of progression. When stratified by glomerular filtration rate stages, the respective total mean annual costs at stages glomerular filtration rate Stages G3a-G3b and G4 were S$3290 (132%; P = 0.001) and S$4416 (135%; P = 0.011) higher post-progression. Conclusion Chronic kidney disease progression in T2DM is associated with high medical costs. The cost of progression is higher with higher severity of CKD stage at baseline and could be largely driven by inpatient admission.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available