4.1 Article

Effect of root nitrogen supply forms on attraction and repulsion of second-stage juveniles of Meloidogyne graminicola

Journal

NEMATOLOGY
Volume 15, Issue -, Pages 469-482

Publisher

BRILL ACADEMIC PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1163/15685411-00002697

Keywords

ammonium; hydroponics; IRRI rice nutrient; migration; nematode; nitrate; rice plant

Categories

Funding

  1. UK-India Education and Research Initiative (UKIERI)
  2. Rothamsted Research
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC)
  4. British Council
  5. Indian Council of Agricultural Research
  6. BBSRC [BB/L004305/1, BBS/E/C/00004967] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/E/C/00004967, BB/L004305/1, BBS/E/C/00004166] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Three experiments were conducted to compare the attraction and repulsion of second-stage juveniles (J2) of the root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne graminicola, to rice plants supplied with different forms of nitrogen. The rice plants were hydroponically grown in a full nutrient solution containing different concentrations (0.1 or 10.0 mM) of nitrate (NO3-) or forms of nitrogen supply (2.85 mM calcium nitrate (Ca(NO3)(2)), ammonium nitrate (NH4NO3) or ammonium chloride (NH4Cl)) for 2 weeks. Five rice plants were placed with their roots in one corner of a Perspex X or Y-chamber partly filled with agar and J2 were inoculated onto the chambers. The data show that J2 of M. graminicola were significantly attracted towards the roots of rice plants grown in hydroponics containing 0.1 mM NO3- and 2.85 mM Ca(NO3)(2), but repelled by 10.0 mM NO3-, 2.85 mM NH4NO3 and NH4Cl. The results suggest that the application of ammonia-based nitrogen fertiliser to the rice nursery bed may interfere with nematode attraction and thus reduce invasion, and the application of chemical nitrification inhibitors to rice nursery beds may decrease nematode invasion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available