4.5 Article

Non-classical regulation of β1- and β2-adrenoceptor-mediated inotropic responses in rat heart ventricle by the G protein Gi

Journal

NAUNYN-SCHMIEDEBERGS ARCHIVES OF PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 387, Issue 12, Pages 1177-1186

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00210-014-1036-7

Keywords

Contractility; cAMP; Pertussis toxin; Heart failure; Receptor signalling; Inhibitory G protein

Funding

  1. Norwegian Council on Cardiovascular Diseases
  2. Research Council of Norway
  3. Stiftelsen Kristian Gerhard Jebsen foundation
  4. Anders Jahre foundation for the promotion of science
  5. Family Blix foundation
  6. Simon-Fougner-Hartmann family foundation
  7. University of Oslo

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Studies suggest that increased activity of G(i) contributes to the reduced beta-adrenoceptor-mediated inotropic response (beta AR-IR) in failing cardiomyocytes and that beta(2)AR-IR but not beta(1)AR-IR is blunted by dual coupling to G(s) and G(i). We aimed to clarify the role of G(i) upon the beta(1)AR-IR and beta(2)AR-IR in Sham and failing myocardium by directly measuring contractile force and cAMP accumulation. Contractility was measured ex vivo in left ventricular strips and cAMP accumulation in cardiomyocytes from rats with post-infarction heart failure (HF) or sham operates (Sham). The beta(2)AR-IR in Sham and HF was small and was amplified by simultaneously inhibiting phosphodiesterases 3 and 4 (PDE3&4). In HF, the inotropic response and cAMP accumulation evoked by beta(1)AR- or beta(2)AR-stimulation were reduced. Inactivation of G(i) with pertussis toxin (PTX) did not restore the beta(1)AR-IR or beta(2)AR-IR in HF to Sham levels but did enhance the maximal beta(2)AR-IR. PTX increased both beta(1)AR- and beta(2)AR-evoked cAMP accumulation more in Sham than that in HF, and HF levels approached those in untreated Sham. The potency of agonists at beta(1) and at beta(2)ARs (only under PDE3&4 inhibition) was increased in HF and by PTX in both HF and Sham. Without PDE3&4 inhibition, PTX increased only the maximal beta(2)AR-IR, not potency. We conclude that G(i) regulates both beta(1)AR- and beta(2)AR-IR independent of receptor coupling with G(i). G(i) together with PDE3&4 tonically restrict the beta(2)AR-IR. G(i) inhibition did not restore the beta AR-IR in HF despite increasing cAMP levels, suggesting that the mechanism of impairment resides downstream to cAMP signalling.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available