3.9 Article

Cross-species correlation between queen mating numbers and worker ovary sizes suggests kin conflict may influence ovary size evolution in honeybees

Journal

NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN
Volume 98, Issue 9, Pages 795-799

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00114-011-0822-z

Keywords

Social evolution; Levels of selection; Worker reproduction; Caste divergence; Reproductive conflict; Ovarioles

Funding

  1. National Institute of Food and Agriculture
  2. US Department of Agriculture [2010-65104-20533]
  3. National Institute of Aging [PO1 AG22500]
  4. National Science Foundation [0615502]
  5. National Research University of Thailand's Office of the Higher Education Commission
  6. NIFA [581025, 2010-65104-20533] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

During social evolution, the ovary size of reproductively specialized honey bee queens has dramatically increased while their workers have evolved much smaller ovaries. However, worker division of labor and reproductive competition under queenless conditions are influenced by worker ovary size. Little comparative information on ovary size exists in the different honey bee species. Here, we report ovariole numbers of freshly dissected workers from six Apis species from two locations in Southeast Asia. The average number of worker ovarioles differs significantly among species. It is strongly correlated with the average mating number of queens, irrespective of body size. Apis dorsata, in particular, is characterized by numerous matings and very large worker ovaries. The relation between queen mating number and ovary size across the six species suggests that individual selection via reproductive competition plays a role in worker ovary size evolution. This indicates that genetic diversity, generated by multiple mating, may bear a fitness cost at the colony level.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available