4.5 Review

Repair and tissue engineering techniques for articular cartilage

Journal

NATURE REVIEWS RHEUMATOLOGY
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages 21-34

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nrrheum.2014.157

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH [R01 AR061496, R01 DE019666, R01 DE015038]
  2. California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM) [TR3-05709]
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ARTHRITIS AND MUSCULOSKELETAL AND SKIN DISEASES [R01AR061496] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DENTAL & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH [R01DE015038, R01DE019666] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chondral and osteochondral lesions due to injury or other pathology commonly result in the development of osteoarthritis, eventually leading to progressive total joint destruction. Although current progress suggests that biologic agents can delay the advancement of deterioration, such drugs are incapable of promoting tissue restoration. The limited ability of articular cartilage to regenerate renders joint arthroplasty an unavoidable surgical intervention. This Review describes current, widely used clinical repair techniques for resurfacing articular cartilage defects; short-term and long-term clinical outcomes of these techniques are discussed. Also reviewed is a developmental pipeline of acellular and cellular regenerative products and techniques that could revolutionize joint care over the next decade by promoting the development of functional articular cartilage. Acellular products typically consist of collagen or hyaluronic-acid-based materials, whereas cellular techniques use either primary cells or stem cells, with or without scaffolds. Central to these efforts is the prominent role that tissue engineering has in translating biological technology into clinical products; therefore, concomitant regulatory processes are also discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available