4.8 Article

The proportionality between relative plate velocity and seismicity in subduction zones

Journal

NATURE GEOSCIENCE
Volume 6, Issue 9, Pages 780-784

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NGEO1901

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [23244090]
  2. MEXT KAKENHI [21107007]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21107007, 23244090] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Maximum earthquake magnitude and the rate of seismic activity apparently differ among subduction zones. This variation is attributed to factors such as subduction zone temperature and stress, and the type of material being subducted(1-5). The relative velocity between the downgoing and overriding plates controls their tectonic deformation. It is also thought to correlate with seismicity(1,2,6-8). Here I use the epidemic type aftershock sequence model(9,10) to calculate the background seismicity rate-the frequency of seismic events above magnitude 4.5-for 117 sections of subduction zones worldwide, during the past century. I demonstrate a proportionality relationship whereby relative plate velocity correlates positively with seismicity rate. This relationship is prominent in the southwestern Pacific Ocean. However, although seismically active, this region has not experienced a magnitude 9 earthquake since 1900. In contrast, the Cascadia, Nankai, southern Chilean and Alaskan subduction zones exhibit low background seismicity rates, yet have experienced magnitude 9 earthquakes in the past century. Slow slip occurs in many of these regions, implying that slow deformation may aid nucleation of very large earthquakes. The proportionality relationship could be used to assess the seismic risk between two endmembers: active subduction zones that generate moderate earthquakes and quiet subduction zones that generate extremely large earthquakes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available