4.2 Article

Vulnerability mapping of groundwater aquifer using SINTACS in Wadi Al-Waleh Catchment, Jordan

Journal

ARABIAN JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s12517-015-2080-4

Keywords

Aquifer vulnerability; Pollution; SINTACS model; Imaging map; Wadi Al-Waleh Catchment; Wadi Mujib

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper aims at evaluating the level of ground-water vulnerability to pollution in Wadi Al-Waleh wells and South Amman area based on SINTACS model. The Wadi Al-Waleh Catchment (WWC) is considered to be one of the most important sub-basins in the middle part of Jordan. This study creates a map of groundwater vulnerability that shows areas with potential pollution. Areas are then classified into units with different levels of vulnerability based on anthropogenic and hydrogeological factors. The parameters of the SINTACS model are rated and evaluated by weight numerical indices. The vulnerability parameter is set upon fixed percentage interval of the sub-basin's area. SINTACS index values have been categorized into four groups of pollution: very low (green), low (yellow), medium (orange), and medium to high (red). The results reveal that the units with very low levels of vulnerability to pollution cover an area of 0.17 km(2). In addition. units with low, medium, and medium to high levels of vulnerability to pollution cover areas of 44.13, 1102.37, and 654.97 km(2), respectively. The vulnerability maps show that most of the sub-surface area of WWC is characterized by medium to high levels of vulnerability to pollution, while units with very low and low vulnerability to pollution cover small areas of the western part of WWC. As well, the vulnerability maps show that there is moderate high risk of pollution in the middle to eastern parts of WWC sub-basin, The risk of pollution in WWC mainly stems from intensive agricultural activities in the area.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available