4.2 Article

A field investigation for overlying strata behaviour study during protective seam longwall overmining

Journal

ARABIAN JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES
Volume 8, Issue 10, Pages 7797-7809

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s12517-015-1827-2

Keywords

Protective seam overmining technology; Field test; Overlying strata failure; Fracture attributes

Funding

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2012LWB43]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51274088, 51304065]
  3. Doctor Foundation of Henan Polytechnic University [B2012-064]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Field experiments were conducted in a protected coal seam using three borehole methods: multi-point displacement measuring, double end seal with water injection method and borehole television photographing. These methods were used to study the movement law of overburden strata in the Sihe no. 2 Coal Mine, China. Results show that, parallel to the retreating direction, the overlying strata of the #9 coal seam can be divided into four sections: the coal wall support zone (0 similar to 8.1 m), the roof separation zone (8.1 similar to 23.0 m), the caving compaction zone (23.0 similar to 43.0 m) and the analogous in situ zone (>43.0 m). In the vertical perpendicular retreating direction, the height of the boundary between the fracturing and caving zones is 4.3 similar to 5.7 m, while the height between the fracturing and deformation zones is 27.5 similar to 30.5 m, with an overburden strata bulking factor of 1.36 similar to 1.54. After the lower protective seam (#9 coal seam) is mined, the overlying strata failure mainly develops in the weak rock layers of the fracturing and caving zones, rather than in the deformation zone. The number of mine-induced fractures is greatly increased, the fractures are broadened and mine interactivity fractures are mostly oriented horizontally.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available