4.6 Article

Interaction between land-use change, flooding and human health in Metro Vancouver, Canada

Journal

NATURAL HAZARDS
Volume 72, Issue 2, Pages 1219-1230

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-014-1064-0

Keywords

Land-use change; Remote sensing; Vegetation; Flood; Health

Funding

  1. International Development Research Center (IDRC)
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  4. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Many regions of the world are experiencing an increase in frequency and intensity of floods. There has been increasing understanding among emergency preparedness and natural disaster planners that rapid urbanization is enhancing the risk from river flooding in urban areas. Many regions of Canada have been exposed to particularly severe floods over the course of the last few years, much of this due to land-use change. This study aims at understanding the risk of flooding for the City of Metro Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, which is located in the Fraser River Delta. The paper presents a fast, efficient and reliable method that can be used to produce vegetation maps from advanced very high resolution radiometer images and SPOT vegetation maps. A 10-day maximum normalized difference vegetation index maps were produced to assess the dynamics of the urbanization process in Vancouver. Remotely sensed data show a significant decrease in vegetation cover in the Metro Vancouver City between 1984 and 2012. The proposed method can be used as an effective tool for raising early land-use change awareness and assist with flood risk management. Flood risk management has a substantial impact on human health and well-being in urban areas, and this flood risk information will be used to assess the impact of flooding and explore the complex relationship between land-use change, urbanization, flooding and impact on urban dwellers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available