4.3 Article

Expanding the landscape of biological computation with synthetic multicellular consortia

Journal

NATURAL COMPUTING
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages 485-497

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11047-013-9380-y

Keywords

Synthetic biology; Cell computing; Circuit design; Evolution; Robustness

Funding

  1. European Research Council
  2. MINECO [FIS2009-12365]
  3. Botin Foundation
  4. Santa Fe Institute
  5. ICREA Funding Source: Custom

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Computation is an intrinsic attribute of biological entities. All of them gather and process information and respond in predictable ways to an uncertain external environment. Are these computations similar to those performed by artificial systems? Can a living computer be constructed following standard engineering practices? Despite the similarities between molecular networks associated to information processing and the wiring diagrams used to represent electronic circuits, major differences arise. Such differences are specially relevant while engineering molecular circuits in order to build novel functionalities. Among others, wiring molecular components within a cell becomes a great challenge as soon as the complexity of the circuit becomes larger than simple gates. An alternative approach has been recently introduced based on a non-standard approach to cellular computation. By breaking some standard assumptions of engineering design, it allows the synthesis of multicellular engineered circuits able to perform complex functions and open a novel form of computation. Here we review previous studies dealing with both natural and synthetic forms of computation. We compare different systems spanning many spatial and temporal scales and outline a possible space of biological forms of computation. We suggest that a novel approach to build synthetic devices using multicellular consortia allows expanding this space in new directions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available