4.8 Article

In Situ Quantitative Study of Nanoscale Triboelectrification and Patterning

Journal

NANO LETTERS
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages 2771-2776

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nl401006x

Keywords

Triboelectric; atomic force microscopy; scanning Kelvin probe microscopy; nanogenerators; TENG

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-FG02-07ER46394]
  2. NSF [0946418]
  3. Knowledge Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Science [KJCX2-YW-M13]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By combining contact-mode atomic force microscopy (AFM) and scanning Kevin probe microscopy (SKPM), we demonstrated an in situ method for quantitative characterization of the triboelectrification process at the nanoscale. We systematically characterized the charge distribution, multifriction effect on charge transfer, as well as subsequent charge diffusion on the dielectric surface: (i) the SiO2 surface can be either positively or negatively charged through triboelectric process using Si-based AFM probes with and without Pt coating, respectively; (ii) the triboelectric charges accumulated from multifriction and eventually reached to saturated concentrations of (-150 +/- 8) mu C/m(2) and (105 +/- 6) mu/m(2), respectively; (iii) the charge diffusion coefficients on SiO2 surface were measured to be (1.10 +/- 0.03) x 10(-15) m(2)/s for the positive charge and (0.19 +/- 0.01) x 10(-15) m(2)/s for the negative charges. These quantifications will facilitate a fundamental understanding about the triboelectric and de-electrification process, which is important for designing high performance triboelectric nanogenerators. In addition, we demonstrated a technique for nanopatterning of surface charges without assistance of external electric field, which has a promising potential application for directed self-assembly of charged nanostructures for nanoelectronic devices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available