4.2 Article

An expanded multilocus phylogeny does not resolve morphological species within the small-spored Alternaria species complex

Journal

MYCOLOGIA
Volume 101, Issue 1, Pages 95-109

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.3852/08-135

Keywords

population-level systematics; small-spored Alternaria species; taxonomy

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Small-spored Alternaria species are a taxonomically challenging g group of fungi With few morphological or molecular characters that. allow unambiguous discrimination among taxa. The prorein-coding genes most commonly employed in fungal systematics are invariant among these taxa, so noncoding, anonymous regions of the genome were developed to assess evolutionary relationships among these organisms. Nineteen sequence-characterized amplified regions (SCAR) were screened for phylogenetic utility by comparing sequences among reference isolates of small-spored Alternaria species. Five of nineteen loci were consistently amplifiable and had sufficient phylogenetic signal. Phylogenetic analyses were performed with 150 small-spored Alternaria, isolates Using sequence data from all endopolygalacturonase gene and two anonymous loci. Associations among phylogenetic lineage, morphological classification, geography and host were evaluated For Use its practical taxonomic characters. Samples included isolates front citrus in Florida, pistachio in California, desert plants in Arizona, walnuts in France/Italy and apples in South Africa. No associations were Bound between host or geographic associations and phylogenetic lineage, indicating that these characters were not useful for cladistic classification of small-spored Alternaria. Similarly strict congruence between morphology and phylogenetic lineage was not found among isolates grouped morphologically with A. alternata or A. tenuissima. In contrast 34 isolates grouped morphologically with A. arborescens fell in to discrete clades for all datasets. Although 5-9 well supported clades were evident among isolates, it is currently unclear if these clades should be considered phylogenetic species or emerging evolutionary line, ages within the phylogenetically defined alternata species-group.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available