4.1 Article

Radiation damage to DNA in DNA-protein complexes

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2011.02.003

Keywords

DNA-protein complex; Ionizing radiation; Molecular structure

Funding

  1. CNRS
  2. INSERM
  3. Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic
  4. Electricity of France
  5. League against Cancer
  6. Association for Research against Cancer
  7. Grants Agency of the ASCR
  8. bilateral French-Czech program (CNRS-ASCR)
  9. bilateral French-Czech program (Barrande-Egide)
  10. European COST [P9, CM0603]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The most aggressive product of water radiolysis, the hydroxyl (OH center dot) radical, is responsible for the indirect effect of ionizing radiations on DNA in solution and aerobic conditions. According to radiolytic footprinting experiments, the resulting strand breaks and base modifications are inhomogeneously distributed along the DNA molecule irradiated free or bound to ligands (polyamines, thiols, proteins). A Monte-Carlo based model of simulation of the reaction of OH center dot radicals with the macromolecules, called RADACK, allows calculating the relative probability of damage of each nucleotide of DNA irradiated alone or in complexes with proteins. RADACK calculations require the knowledge of the three dimensional structure of DNA and its complexes (determined by X-ray crystallography, NMR spectroscopy or molecular modeling). The confrontation of the calculated values with the results of the radiolytic footprinting experiments together with molecular modeling calculations show that: (1) the extent and location of the lesions are strongly dependent on the structure of DNA, which in turns is modulated by the base sequence and by the binding of proteins and (2) the regions in contact with the protein can be protected against the attack by the hydroxyl radicals via masking of the binding site and by scavenging of the radicals. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available