4.4 Article

ON THE INFINITE SWAPPING LIMIT FOR PARALLEL TEMPERING

Journal

MULTISCALE MODELING & SIMULATION
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages 986-1022

Publisher

SIAM PUBLICATIONS
DOI: 10.1137/110853145

Keywords

parallel tempering; Monte Carlo; large deviations; empirical measure; relative entropy; rate of convergence; Gibbs measures

Funding

  1. Department of Energy [DE-SCOO02413, DE-00015561]
  2. National Science Foundation [DMS-1008331]
  3. Air Force Office of Scientific Research [FA9550-07-1-0544, FA9550-09-1-0378]
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation
  5. Division Of Mathematical Sciences
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1008331] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Parallel tempering, also known as replica exchange sampling, is an important method for simulating complex systems. In this algorithm simulations are conducted in parallel at a series of temperatures, and the key feature of the algorithm is a swap mechanism that exchanges configurations between the parallel simulations at a given rate. The mechanism is designed to allow the low temperature system of interest to escape from deep local energy minima where it might otherwise be trapped via those swaps with the higher temperature components. In this paper we introduce a performance criterion for such schemes based on large deviation theory and argue that the rate of convergence is a monotone increasing function of the swap rate. This motivates the study of the limit process as the swap rate goes to infinity. We construct a scheme which is equivalent to this limit in a distributional sense but which involves no swapping at all. Instead, the effect of the swapping is captured by a collection of weights that influence both the dynamics and the empirical measure. While theoretically optimal, this limit is not computationally feasible when the number of temperatures is large, and so variations that are easy to implement and nearly optimal are also developed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available