Mean opinion score (MOS) revisited: methods and applications, limitations and alternatives
Published 2014 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Mean opinion score (MOS) revisited: methods and applications, limitations and alternatives
Authors
Keywords
Customer opinion, Psychophysics, Subjective MOS, Objective MOS, Quality monitoring, Fault isolation, Service level agreements
Journal
MULTIMEDIA SYSTEMS
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages 213-227
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2014-12-27
DOI
10.1007/s00530-014-0446-1
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Toward total quality of experience: A QoE model in a communication ecosystem
- (2012) Khalil Rehman Laghari et al. IEEE COMMUNICATIONS MAGAZINE
- Analysis of Public Image and Video Databases for Quality Assessment
- (2012) Stefan Winkler IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing
- Review of objective video quality metrics and performance comparison using different databases
- (2012) Mario Vranješ et al. SIGNAL PROCESSING-IMAGE COMMUNICATION
- Blind Image Quality Assessment Without Human Training Using Latent Quality Factors
- (2011) Anish Mittal et al. IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING LETTERS
- Video is a Cube
- (2011) Christian Keimel et al. IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING MAGAZINE
- Objective Video Quality Assessment Methods: A Classification, Review, and Performance Comparison
- (2011) Shyamprasad Chikkerur et al. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BROADCASTING
- Perceptual visual quality metrics: A survey
- (2011) Weisi Lin et al. JOURNAL OF VISUAL COMMUNICATION AND IMAGE REPRESENTATION
- Perceptual Quality Measurement—Towards a More Efficient Process for Validating Objective Models [Standards in a Nutshell
- (2010) Robert Streijl et al. IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING MAGAZINE
- Assessing Quality of Experience of IPTV and Video on Demand Services in Real-Life Environments
- (2010) Nicolas Staelens et al. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BROADCASTING
- Study of Rating Scales for Subjective Quality Assessment of High-Definition Video
- (2010) Quan Huynh-Thu et al. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BROADCASTING
- Measuring the Quality of Quality Measures
- (2010) Hila Nachlieli et al. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING
- Perceptual-based quality assessment for audio–visual services: A survey
- (2010) Junyong You et al. SIGNAL PROCESSING-IMAGE COMMUNICATION
- No-reference image and video quality estimation: Applications and human-motivated design
- (2010) Sheila S. Hemami et al. SIGNAL PROCESSING-IMAGE COMMUNICATION
- Consumer Opinions About Frequency of Artifacts in Digital Video
- (2009) Gregory W. Cermak IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing
- VQeg validation and ITU standardization of objective perceptual video quality metrics [Standards in a Nutshell]
- (2009) K. Brunnstrom et al. IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING MAGAZINE
- Quality control and improvement for multistage systems: A survey
- (2009) Jianjun Shi et al. IIE TRANSACTIONS
- Subjective video quality comparison using various displays
- (2009) Hyunsoo Choi OPTICAL ENGINEERING
- Content and quality
- (2008) Jenni Radun et al. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception
- Structural Similarity Quality Metrics in a Coding Context: Exploring the Space of Realistic Distortions
- (2008) A.C. Brooks et al. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING
- Cross-Dimensional Perceptual Quality Assessment for Low Bit-Rate Videos
- (2008) Guangtao Zhai et al. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MULTIMEDIA
- Maximum differentiation (MAD) competition: A methodology for comparing computational models of perceptual quantities
- (2008) Z. Wang et al. JOURNAL OF VISION
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started