4.6 Article

Interventions for Fatigue in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Journal

MOVEMENT DISORDERS
Volume 29, Issue 13, Pages 1675-1678

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mds.26030

Keywords

Parkinson's disease; fatigue; meta-analysis; dopamine; amphetamines

Funding

  1. National Institute for Health Research
  2. Oxford Brookes University
  3. Elizabeth Casson Trust
  4. National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR) [PB-PG-0110-20250] Funding Source: National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR)
  5. National Institute for Health Research [PB-PG-0110-20250] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The authors sought to review the efficacy of interventions for fatigue in Parkinson's disease. A search was conducted of PubMed, Cinahl, Psychinfo, EMBASE, and Web of Knowledge up to November 2013. Methodological quality was assessed using the PEDro scale. For meta-analyses, studies were weighted on variance. Effect sizes were calculated with 95% confidence interval (CI); overall effect was presented by means of a Z-score; heterogeneity was investigated using the I-2. Fourteen articles (n = 1,890) investigating drugs and behavioral therapy were eligible. Ten studies demonstrated excellent, three good, and one fair methodological quality. Three articles (investigating amphetamines) were appropriate for meta-analysis, which was performed according to scales used: Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory: mean difference, -6.13 (95%CI: -14.63-2.37, Z = 1.41, P = 0.16; I-2 = 0); Fatigue Severity Scale: mean difference, -4.00 (95%CI: -8.72-0.72, Z = 1.66, P = 0.10; I-2 = 0). Currently insufficient evidence exists to support the treatment of fatigue in PD with any drug or nondrug treatment. Further study is required. (c) 2014 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available