4.6 Article

Arbitrary Visuomotor Mapping During Object Manipulation in Parkinson's Disease

Journal

MOVEMENT DISORDERS
Volume 24, Issue 13, Pages 1925-1933

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mds.22543

Keywords

grip force; lift force; conditional motor learning; basal ganglia

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [NO737/4-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of this study is to investigate whether subjects with Parkinson's disease Lire able to use arbitrary color cues linked to the mass of an object to be lifted allowing for the predictive selection of appropriate grip forces. Fourteen patients with Parkinson's disease used a precision grip to lift two objects of different masses (400 and 600 g) in random order. In a no cue condition, a noninformative neutral visual stimulus was presented before each lift, thereby not allowing any judgement about which mass to be lifted. In a cue condition an arbitrary color cue provided advance information about which of the two masses patients Would have to lift in the subsequent trial. Patients performed the conditions with either hand and by both on and off drugs. In the no cue trials patients scaled the predictive grip force output according to the perceived mass of the preceding lift. In the cue experiment patients scaled grip force in a predictive manner to mass based on the provided color cues. The ability of arbitrary visuomotor mapping was evident at either hand and not influenced by medication on/off. The precision of arbitrary visuomotor mapping correlated negatively with age, but not with disease duration, severity of motor disability on and off drug, severity of cognitive impairment on and off drug, or the amount of levodopa equivalent daily dosage of dopaminergic drugs. These data imply that Parkinson's disease does not preclude the ability of visuomotor mapping in the grip-lift task. (C) 2009 Movement Disorder Society

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available