4.7 Article

The WAGGS project - II. The reliability of the calcium triplet as a metallicity indicator in integrated stellar light

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 482, Issue 1, Pages 1275-1303

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty2611

Keywords

stars: abundances; globular clusters: general; galaxies: abundances; galaxies: star clusters: general; galaxies: stellar content

Funding

  1. European Research Council (Multi-Pop) [ERC-CoG-646928]
  2. FONDECYT [3160375]
  3. AAO PhD Topup Scholarship [CE170100013]
  4. Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for All Sky Astrophysics in 3 Dimensions (ASTRO 3D) [CE170100013]
  5. ESO Telescopes at the La Silla Paranal Observatory [188.B-3002]
  6. National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using data from the WiFeS Atlas of Galactic Globular cluster Spectra, we study the behaviour of the calcium triplet (CaT), a popular metallicity indicator in extragalactic stellar population studies. A major caveat of these studies is that the potential sensitivity to other stellar population parameters such as age, calcium abundance, and the initial mass function has not yet been empirically evaluated. Here, we present measurements of the strength of the CaT feature for 113 globular clusters in the Milky Way and its satellite galaxies. We derive empirical calibrations between the CaT index and both the iron abundance ([Fe/H]) and calcium abundance ([Ca/H]), finding a tighter relationship for [Ca/H] than for [Fe/H]. For stellar populations, 3 Gyr and older the CaT can be used to reliably measure [Ca/H] at the 0.1 dex level but becomes less reliable for ages of Gyr and younger. We find that the CaT is relatively insensitive to the horizontal branch morphology. The stellar mass function however affects the CaT strengths significantly only at low metallicities. Using our newly derived empirical calibration, we convert our measured CaT indices into [Ca/H] values for the globular clusters in our sample.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available