4.7 Article

Uncertainty quantification for radio interferometric imaging - I. Proximal MCMC methods

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 480, Issue 3, Pages 4154-4169

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty2004

Keywords

methods: data analysis; methods: numerical; methods: statistical; techniques: image processing; techniques: interferometric

Funding

  1. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/M011089/1]
  2. Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC) [ST/M00113X/1]
  3. EPSRC [EP/M011089/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. STFC [ST/M00113X/1, ST/N000811/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Uncertainty quantification is a critical missing component in radio interferometric imaging that will only become increasingly important as the big-data era of radio interferometry emerges. Since radio interferometric imaging requires solving a high-dimensional, ill-posed inverse problem, uncertainty quantification is difficult but also critical to the accurate scientific interpretation of radio observations. Statistical sampling approaches to perform Bayesian inference, like Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling, can in principle recover the full posterior distribution of the image, from which uncertainties can then be quantified. However, traditional high-dimensional sampling methods are generally limited to smooth (e.g. Gaussian) priors and cannot be used with sparsity-promoting priors. Sparse priors, motivated by the theory of compressive sensing, have been shown to be highly effective for radio interferometric imaging. In this article proximal MCMC methods are developed for radio interferometric imaging, leveraging proximal calculus to support non-differential priors, such as sparse priors, in a Bayesian framework. Furthermore, three strategies to quantify uncertainties using the recovered posterior distribution are developed: (i) local (pixel-wise) credible intervals to provide error bars for each individual pixel; (ii) highest posterior density credible regions; and (iii) hypothesis testing of image structure. These forms of uncertainty quantification provide rich information for analysing radio interferometric observations in a statistically robust manner.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available