4.7 Article

The late jet in gamma-ray bursts and its interactions with a supernova ejecta and a cocoon

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 403, Issue 1, Pages 229-245

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.16155.x

Keywords

supernovae: general; gamma-rays: bursts; gamma-rays: theory

Funding

  1. NSF [AST-0909110]
  2. ERC
  3. ISF Center for High Energy Astrophysics
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  5. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [0909110] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Late X-ray flares observed in X-ray afterglows of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) suggest late central engine activities at a few minutes to hours after the burst. A few unambiguously confirmed cases of supernova associations with nearby long GRBs imply that an accompanying supernova-like component might be a common feature in all long GRB events. These motivate us to study the interactions of a late jet, responsible for an X-ray flare, with various components in a stellar explosion, responsible for a GRB. These components include a supernova shell-like ejecta and a cocoon that was produced when the main jet producing the GRB itself was propagating through the progenitor star. We find that the interaction between the late jet and the supernova ejecta may produce a luminous (up to 1049 erg s-1) thermal X-ray transient lasting for similar to 10 s. The interaction between the late jet and the cocoon produces synchrotron self-absorbed non-thermal emission, with the observed peak X-ray flux density from 0.001 mu Jy to 1 mJy at 1 keV and a peak optical flux density from 0.01 mu Jy to 0.1 Jy (for a redshift z = 2). The light curve due to the late-jet-cocoon interaction has a very small pulse-width-to-time ratio, delta t/t approximate to 0.01-0.5, where t is the pulse peak time since the burst trigger. Identifying these features in current and future observations would open a new frontier in the study of GRB progenitor stars.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available