4.7 Article

On the quasi-periodic oscillations in magnetars

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 396, Issue 3, Pages 1441-1448

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14878.x

Keywords

stars: magnetic field; stars: neutron; stars: oscillations

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG (German Research Foundation)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We study torsional Alfven oscillations of magnetars, that is neutron stars with a strong magnetic field. We consider the poloidal and toroidal components of the magnetic field and a wide range of equilibrium stellar models. We use a new coordinate system (X, Y), where X = root a(1) sin theta and Y = root a(1) cos theta and a(1) is the radical component of the magnetic field. In this coordinate system, the one+two-dimensional evolution equation describing the quasi-periodic oscillations (QPOs), see Sotani et al., is reduced to a one+one-dimensional equation where the perturbations propagate only along the y-axis. We solve the one+one-dimensional equation for different boundary conditions and the open magnetic field lines, that is magnetic field lines that reach the surface and there match up with the exterior dipole magnetic field as well as closed magnetic lines, i.e. magnetic lines that never reach the stellar surface. For the open field lines, we find two families of QPO frequencies: a family of 'lower' QPO frequencies which is located near the x-axis and a family of 'upper' frequencies located near the y-axis. According to Levin, the fundamental frequencies of these two families can be interpreted as the turning point of the continuous spectrum. We find that the upper frequencies are multiples of the lower ones by a constant equalling 2n + 1. For the closed lines, the corresponding factor is n + 1. By using these relations, we can explain both the lower and the higher observed frequencies in SGR 1806-20 and SGR 1900+14.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available