4.4 Article

X-band rapid-scan EPR of samples with long electron spin relaxation times: a comparison of continuous wave, pulse and rapid-scan EPR

Journal

MOLECULAR PHYSICS
Volume 111, Issue 18-19, Pages 2664-2673

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00268976.2013.792959

Keywords

rapid-scan EPR; hydrogenated silicon; N@C-60; single substitutional N in diamond

Funding

  1. NSF IDBR [0753018]
  2. NSF
  3. BMBF [03SF0328]
  4. Div Of Biological Infrastructure
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences [0753018] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

X-band room temperature spectra obtained by rapid-scan, continuous wave, field-swept echo-detected and Fourier transform electron paramagnetic resonance (FTEPR) were compared for three samples with long electron spin relaxation times: amorphous hydrogenated silicon (T-1 = 11s, T-2 = 3.3s), 0.2% N@C-60 solid (T-1 = 120-160s, T-2 = 2.8s) and neutral single substitutional nitrogen centres (N-S(0)) in diamonds (T-1 = 2300s, T-2 = 230s). For each technique, experimental parameters were selected to give less than 2% broadening of the lineshape. For the same data acquisition times, the signal-to-noise for the rapid-scan spectra was one-to-two orders of magnitude better than for continuous wave or field-swept echo-detected spectra. For amorphous hydrogenated silicon, T-2(*) (approximate to 10ns) is too short to perform FTEPR. For 0.2% N@C-60, the signal-to-noise ratio for rapid scan is about five times better than for FTEPR. For N-S(0) the signal-to-noise ratio is similar for rapid scan and FTEPR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available