4.7 Article

The phylogenetic position of some Philippine babblers spans the muscicapoid and sylvioid bird radiations

Journal

MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION
Volume 65, Issue 2, Pages 799-804

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2012.07.029

Keywords

Biogeography; Leonardina; Malia; Micromacronus; Robsonius; Timaliidae

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [DEB 0743576, DEB 0743491, DEB 0962078]
  2. Direct For Biological Sciences
  3. Division Of Environmental Biology [743491] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Division Of Environmental Biology
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences [0743576, 0962078] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Philippines is characterized by a high rate of endemism among its terrestrial vertebrates, including enigmatic genera with uncertain affinities. In a recent comprehensive study of the avian family of Timaliidae (babblers), it was shown that three putative babbler genera endemic to the Philippines (Leonardina, Robsonius, and Micromacronus) are distant relatives of Timaliidae. With additional DNA sequences from new samples and data from Genbank, we attempt to determine the phylogenetic affinities of these three genera and examine the resulting implications for biogeography and avian endemism in the Philippines. Well-supported phylogenies recover the three genera in three different families spanning the sylvioid and muscicapoid radiations of passerine birds. Leonardina groups with Muscicapidae and is most closely related to other isolated montane endemic species in Southeast Asia. Robsonius appears to be an early offshoot of Locustellidae. Micromacronus belongs in Cisticolidae, but its position in the family is unresolved. Contrary to implications based on traditional taxonomy, the Philippine archipelago appears to have played a minor role in the diversification of babblers. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available