4.7 Article

Design and Characterization of PEG-Derivatized Vitamin E as a Nanomicellar Formulation for Delivery of Paclitaxel

Journal

MOLECULAR PHARMACEUTICS
Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages 2880-2890

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/mp300729y

Keywords

nanomicelles; paclitaxel; TPGS; controlled and sustained drug delivery; cancer; nanotechnology

Funding

  1. NIH [R21CAl28415, R21CA155983]
  2. DOD [BC09603]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Various PEG Vitamin E conjugates including D-a-tocopheryl poly(ethylene glycol) succinate 1000 (TPGS) have been extensively studied as a nonionic surfactant in various drug delivery systems However, limited information is available about the structure activity relationship of PEG Vitamin E conjugates as a micellar formulation for paclitaxel (PTX). In this study, four PEG Vitamin E conjugates were developed that vary in the molecular weight of PEG (PEG(2K) vs PEG(5K)) and the molar ratio of PEG/Vitamin E (1/1 vs 1/2) in the conjugates These conjugates were systematically characterized with respect to CMC, PTX loading efficiency, stability, and their efficiency in delivery of PTX to tumor cells in vitro and in vivo. Our data show that PEG(5K)-conjugates have lower CMC values and are more effective in PTX loading with respect to both loading capacity and stability. The conjugates with two Vitamin E molecules also worked better than the conjugates with one molecule of Vitamin E, particularly for PEG(2K)-system. Furthermore, all of the PEG Vitamin E conjugates can induce significant suppression of P-gp function. More importantly, PTX-loaded PEG(5K)-VE2 resulted in significantly improved tumor growth inhibitory effect in comparison to PTX formulated in PEG(2K)-VE or PEG(2K)-VE nu as well as Cremophor EL (Taxol) in a syngeneic mouse model of breast cancer (4T1.2). Our study suggests that PEG(5K)-Vitmin E-2 may hold promise as an Unproved micellar formulation for in vivo delivery of anticancer agents such as PTX.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available