4.7 Article

Gamma-Tocotrienol Attenuates the Hepatic Inflammation and Fibrosis by Suppressing Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress in Mice

Journal

MOLECULAR NUTRITION & FOOD RESEARCH
Volume 62, Issue 21, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mnfr.201800519

Keywords

de novo lipogenesis; ER stress; gamma tocotrienol; insulin resistance; NAFLD

Funding

  1. American Heart Association SDG grant [13SDG14410043]
  2. USDA-Hatch grant at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln
  3. USDA-NIFA [2017-67017-26781]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Scope Methods and Results Gamma-tocotrienol (gamma T3), an unsaturated isoform of vitamin E, is implicated in the hepatoprotective effects. The aim is to determine the effectiveness of gamma T3 on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). C57BL/6 male mice are fed a diet containing high fat (45%) and cholesterol (0.2%) along with sucrose drink (HFCS) or HFCS diet supplemented with 0.1% gamma T3 (HFCS + gamma T3). The inclusion of gamma T3 robustly decreases the HFCS diet-induced de novo lipogenesis (DNL), ER stress, and inflammation leading to reduced hepatic steatosis and fibrosis. Next, mice are fed a methionine- and choline-deficient (MCD) diet or MCD diet with gamma T3 (MCD + gamma T3). The gamma T3 supplementation significantly reduces the MCD diet-induced hepatic ER stress and fibrosis despite the minimal impact on steatosis. To further investigate the role of ER stress, the mice with genetic ablation of CHOP are fed an MCD or MCD + gamma T3 diet. CHOP deletion abolishes the gamma T3-mediated suppression of hepatic fibrosis, suggesting that modulation of ER stress is a prerequisite to inhibit hepatic inflammation and fibrosis. Conclusion gamma T3 supplementation is effective in attenuating NAFLD and fibrosis through a synergistic mechanism of decreased DNL and hepatic ER stress. This work strongly supports the translational potential of gamma T3 supplementation against NAFLD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available