4.6 Article

Elevated Serum Mannose-Binding Lectin Levels Are Associated with Poor Outcome After Acute Ischemic Stroke in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

Journal

MOLECULAR NEUROBIOLOGY
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages 1330-1340

Publisher

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12035-014-8941-0

Keywords

Mannose-binding lectin; Type 2 diabetes; Acute ischemic stroke; One-year outcome; Prognostic biomarker

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The activation of the complement system may be involved in the pathology of stroke and type 2 diabetes (T2DM). We therefore evaluated the long-term prognostic value of early measurement of serum mannose-binding lectin (MBL) levels, an activator of the complement system, in Chinese T2DM with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Serum MBL levels were determined in T2DM patients with AIS (N = 188). The adjudicated end points were 1-year functional outcomes and mortality. The prognostic value of MBL was compared with the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score and with other known outcome predictors. Patients with an unfavorable outcomes and nonsurvivors had significantly increased MBL levels on admission (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.0001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for common risk factors showed that MBL was an independent predictor of functional outcome (odds ratio (OR) = 8.99, 95 % CI 2.21-30.12) and mortality (OR = 13.22, 95 % CI 2.05-41.21). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of MBL was 0.75 (95 % CI 0.68-0.83) for functional outcome and 0.85 (95 % CI 0.80-0.90) for mortality. In type 2 diabetic patients with stroke, high levels of MBL predict future functional outcomes and mortality. This indicated that the elevated MBL levels may play a significant role in the pathology of the subsequent damage and that the pathways leading to complement activation warrant further exploration as potential therapeutic targets to improve the prognosis for these patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available