4.5 Article

Transcriptome-wide analysis of trypanosome mRNA decay reveals complex degradation kinetics and suggests a role for co-transcriptional degradation in determining mRNA levels

Journal

MOLECULAR MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 94, Issue 2, Pages 307-326

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/mmi.12764

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. collaborative Sysmo grant 'The silicon trypanosome'
  2. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung, BBSRC [BB/I004602/1]
  3. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO)
  4. Wellcome Trust [088293, 095831]
  5. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinshaft [CL112/17-1]
  6. Rosalind Franklin Fellowship from the University of Groningen
  7. BBSRC [BB/I004602/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/I004602/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

African trypanosomes are an excellent system for quantitative modelling of post-transcriptional mRNA control. Transcription is constitutive and polycistronic; individual mRNAs are excised by trans splicing and polyadenylation. We here measure mRNA decay kinetics in two life cycle stages, bloodstream and procyclic forms, by transcription inhibition and RNASeq. Messenger RNAs with short half-lives tend to show initial fast degradation, followed by a slower phase; they are often stabilized by depletion of the 5-3 exoribonuclease XRNA. Many longer-lived mRNAs show initial slow degradation followed by rapid destruction: we suggest that the slow phase reflects gradual deadenylation. Developmentally regulated mRNAs often show regulated decay, and switch their decay pattern. Rates of mRNA decay are good predictors of steady state levels for short mRNAs, but mRNAs longer than 3kb show unexpectedly low abundances. Modelling shows that variations in splicing and polyadenylation rates can contribute to steady-state mRNA levels, but this is completely dependent on competition between processing and co-transcriptional mRNA precursor destruction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available