4.5 Article

Association between the endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene Glu298Asp polymorphism and coronary heart disease: A meta-analysis of 39 case-control studies

Journal

MOLECULAR MEDICINE REPORTS
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages 1310-1318

Publisher

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2013.1301

Keywords

endothelial nitric oxide synthase; coronary heart disease; polymorphism; meta-analysis

Funding

  1. Beijing Medicine Research and Development Fund [SF-2009-II-18]
  2. Public Health Application Research and Vaccine preventable diseases Research Funds of the Chinese Preventive Medicine Association [20103345]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Numerous studies have indicated that the human endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) gene Glu298Asp polymorphism is associated with coronary heart disease (CHD) susceptibility, however, their conclusions are inconsistent. The present meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the precise result by searching the PubMed database and using 39 case-control studies comprising 7489 cases and 7051 controls. Each study tested the association between the eNOS Glu298Asp polymorphism and CHD. A meta-analysis was then conducted using the Comprehensive Meta Analysis 2.2 software to calculate the pooled odds ratios (ORs) of five genetic models with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Publication bias was also explored. The meta-analysis showed a significant association between the eNOS Glu298Asp polymorphism and CHD susceptibility for all the genetic models [Asp vs. Glu, OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.14-1.40, P<0.001; Asp/Asp vs. Glu/Glu, OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.23-2.02, P<0.001; Glu/Asp vs. Glu/Glu, OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.03-1.22, P=0.001; (Glu/Asp+Asp/Asp) vs. Glu/Glu, OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.07-1.27, P<0.001; Asp/Asp vs. (Glu/Glu+Glu/Asp), OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.25-2.03, P<0.001]. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses indicated that the result was robust. A weak publication bias was detected. The results indicated that the eNOS Glu298Asp polymorphism is a risk factor for developing CHD, particularly in the Asian population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available