4.6 Article

A Tcf4-GFP Reporter Mouse Model for Monitoring Effects of Apc Mutations During Intestinal Tumorigenesis

Journal

MOLECULAR CARCINOGENESIS
Volume 48, Issue 9, Pages 821-831

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mc.20526

Keywords

stem cells; colorectal cancer; Tcf4; adenomatous polyposis coli; survivin; adenoma

Funding

  1. NCI [N01-CN-35106, R21-CA095667-01]
  2. Pennsylvania Department of Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Apc mutations cause intestinal tumorigenesis through Tcf4 activation. However, direct techniques for studying Tcf4 activation in vivo are limited. Here, we describe the development of a Tcf4-GFP reporter mouse model for directly studying Tcf4 activation. We first developed a GFP reporter construct (Tcf4-GFP) and transfected it into SW480 cells that have constitutively activated Tcf4. Reporter activity increased 47-fold. Next, we created transgenic (Tg) mice by transducing the construct into C57BL/6J mice. Fluorescence microscopy did not detect GFP in intestinal sections, but flow cytometry showed 5% of crypt cells to be GFP(+). We then established cross-bred mice (Tg x Apc(Min/+)), which have a germline Apc mutation and sustained Tcf4 activation. Here, fluorescence microscopy showed GFP(+) cells at or near the base of normal-appearing crypts. In adenomas, in which Apc is inactivated, GFP(+) signal was even greater. Immunostaining for the Tcf4 target genes survivin (BIRC5) and cyclin D1 (CCND1) showed that their expression also paralleled GFP positivity. We conclude that GFP directly reports Tcf4 activation in vivo and tracks the predicted increases in Tcf4 activation that result from Apc inactivation, and that Apc mutation contributes to survivin and cyclin D1 overexpression through Tcf4 activation. Our Tcf4 mouse should be useful in studying the effects of chemopreventive agents on Wnt signaling and changes in proliferative crypt cell populations-including stem cells-during intestinal tumorigenesis. (C) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available