4.6 Article

Accuracy of LA-ICPMS zircon U-Pb age determination: An inter-laboratory comparison

Journal

SCIENCE CHINA-EARTH SCIENCES
Volume 58, Issue 10, Pages 1722-1730

Publisher

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11430-015-5110-x

Keywords

zircon U-Pb dating; Laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICPMS); Secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS); accuracy; precision

Funding

  1. State Key Laboratory of Lithospheric Evolution
  2. Analytical & Biomolecular Research Facility (ABRF) unit
  3. National Basic Research Program of China [2012CB416702]
  4. National Research Council of Science & Technology (NST), Republic of Korea [G35200] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

LA-ICPMS zircon U-Pb dating has been greatly advanced and widely applied in the past decade because it is a cheap and fast technique. The internal error of LA-ICPMS zircon U-Pb dating can be better than 1%, but reproducibility (accuracy) is relatively poor. In in order to quantitatively assess the accuracy of this technique, zircons from two dioritic rocks, a Mesozoic dioritic microgranular enclave (FS06) and a Neoproterozoic diorite (WC09-32), were dated independently in eight laboratories using SIMS and LA-ICPMS. Results of three SIMS analyses on FS06 and WC09-2 are indistinguishable within error and give a best estimate of the crystallization age of 132.2 and 760.5 Ma (reproducibility is similar to 1%, 2RSD), respectively. Zircon U-Pb ages determined by LA-ICPMS in six laboratories vary from 128.3 +/- 1.0 to 135.0 +/- 0.9 Ma (2SE) for FS06 and from 742.9 +/- 3.1 to 777.8 +/- 4.7 Ma (2SE) for WC09-32, suggesting a reproducibility of similar to 4% (2RSD). Uncertainty produced during LA-ICPMS zircon U-Pb analyses comes from multiple sources, including uncertainty in the isotopic ratio measurements, uncertainty in the fractionation factor calculation using an external standard, uncertainty in the age determination as a result of common lead correction, age uncertainty of the external standards and uncertainty in the data reduction. Result of our study suggests that the uncertainty of LA-ICPMS zircon U-Pb dating is approximately 4% (2RSD). The uncertainty in age determination must be considered in order to interpret LA-ICPMS zircon U-Pb data rationally.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available