How meaningful are risk determinations in the absence of a complete dataset? Making the case for publishing standardized test guideline and ‘no effect’ studies for evaluating the safety of nanoparticulates versus spurious ‘high effect’ results from single investigative studies

Title
How meaningful are risk determinations in the absence of a complete dataset? Making the case for publishing standardized test guideline and ‘no effect’ studies for evaluating the safety of nanoparticulates versus spurious ‘high effect’ results from single investigative studies
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF ADVANCED MATERIALS
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages 034603
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Online
2015-05-06
DOI
10.1088/1468-6996/16/3/034603

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation

Create your own webinar

Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.

Create Now