4.5 Article

Genetic variation and population structure of swimming crab (Portunus trituberculatus) inferred from mitochondrial control region

Journal

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REPORTS
Volume 39, Issue 2, Pages 1453-1463

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11033-011-0882-3

Keywords

Portunus trituberculatus; Genetic variation; Population structure; Control region

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40976088]
  2. Project in the National Science & Technology Pillar Program [2006BAD09A03]
  3. Chinese National '863' Project [2006AA10A406]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Genetic variation and population structure in Portunus trituberculatus along the coast of China were revealed according to 617 bp of mitochondrial DNA control region. 90 polymorphic sites defined 53 distinct haplotypes, showing a moderately high diversity among 72 individuals sampled from eight localities. Neighbor-joining tree, statistics analyses of gene flow and genetic differentiation index indicated two populations from Beihai and Laizhou had differentiated. The population from Yingkou, Dandong, Laizhou and Beihai had smaller genetic diversity compared to that from Ningbo, Lianyungang, Qingdao and Japan according to the genetic distance. And mantel test showed significant positive correlation between genetic distance and geographic distance for P. trituberculatus. TCS parsimony network suggested that all the animals sampled were probably the result of recent divergence from a common ancestral haplotype but for Laizhou population. Moreover, the haplotype distribution appeared to correlate with a recent colonization followed by localized genetic differentiation. Mismatch distribution results suggested that Ningbo, Yingkou, Qingdao, Lianyungang and Japan populations, particularly Dandong population had experienced a sudden demographic or spatial expansion. The Pleistocene glaciations might contribute to this process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available