4.8 Article

Inferring the Evolutionary History of Primate microRNA Binding Sites: Overcoming Motif Counting Biases

Journal

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
Volume 31, Issue 7, Pages 1894-1901

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msu129

Keywords

molecular evolution; motif turnover; miRNA evolution; regulatory network; molecular phylogeny; parsimony

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation
  2. European Research Council (ERC)
  3. National Institutes of Health [R01NS066586]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The first microRNAs (miRNAs) were identified as essential, conserved regulators of gene expression, targeting the same genes across nearly all bilaterians. However, there are also prominent examples of conserved miRNAs whose functions appear to have shifted dramatically, sometimes over very brief periods of evolutionary time. To determine whether the functions of conserved miRNAs are stable or dynamic over evolutionary time scales, we have here defined the neutral turnover rates of short sequence motifs in predicted primate 3'-UTRs. We find that commonly used approaches to quantify motif turnover rates, which use a presence/absence scoring in extant lineages to infer ancestral states, are inherently biased to infer the accumulation of new motifs, leading to the false inference of continually increasing regulatory complexity over time. Using a maximum likelihood approach to reconstruct individual ancestral nucleotides, we observe that binding sites of conserved miRNAs in fact have roughly equal numbers of gain and loss events relative to ancestral states and turnover extremely slowly relative to nearly identical permutations of the same motif. Contrary to case studies showing examples of functional turnover, our systematic study of miRNA binding sites suggests that in primates, the regulatory roles of conserved miRNAs are strongly conserved. Our revised methodology may be used to quantify the mechanism by which regulatory networks evolve.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available