4.5 Article

Molecular Basis of the Essential S Phase Function of the Rad53 Checkpoint Kinase

Journal

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY
Volume 33, Issue 16, Pages 3202-3213

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.00474-13

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC)
  2. Victorian Government
  3. National Health Research Institute (NHRI) [EX95-9508NI]
  4. Academia Sinica
  5. AIRC (IG grant) [10343]
  6. Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research
  7. Swedish Research Council
  8. Swedish Cancer Society

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The essential yeast kinases Mec1 and Rad53, or human ATR and Chk1, are crucial for checkpoint responses to exogenous genotoxic agents, but why they are also required for DNA replication in unperturbed cells remains poorly understood. Here we report that even in the absence of DNA-damaging agents, the rad53-4AQ mutant, lacking the N-terminal Mec1 phosphorylation site cluster, is synthetic lethal with a deletion of the RAD9 DNA damage checkpoint adaptor. This phenotype is caused by an inability of rad53-4AQ to activate the downstream kinase Dun1, which then leads to reduced basal deoxynucleoside triphosphate (dNTP) levels, spontaneous replication fork stalling, and constitutive activation of and dependence on S phase DNA damage checkpoints. Surprisingly, the kinase-deficient rad53-K227A mutant does not share these phenotypes but is rendered inviable by additional phosphosite mutations that prevent its binding to Dun1. The results demonstrate that ultralow Rad53 catalytic activity is sufficient for normal replication of undamaged chromosomes as long as it is targeted toward activation of the effector kinase Dun1. Our findings indicate that the essential S phase function of Rad53 is comprised by the combination of its role in regulating basal dNTP levels and its compensatory kinase function if dNTP levels are perturbed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available