4.6 Article

VPA inhibits breast cancer cell migration by specifically targeting HDAC2 and down-regulating Survivin

Journal

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 361, Issue 1-2, Pages 39-45

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11010-011-1085-x

Keywords

Breast cancer; Migration; Valproic acid; HDAC2; Survivin

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [90919028, 31071306, 31101061, 30971451]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology [2011CB965100, 2010CB944900, 2010CB945000, 2011CBA01100, 2011DFA30480]
  3. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [09DZ2260100, 11ZR1438500, 11XD1405 300]
  4. Program for Young Excellent Talents in Tongji University [2009KJ089]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cell migration plays major roles in human breast cancer-related death, but the molecular mechanisms remain unclear. Valproic acid (VPA) is a broad-spectrum inhibitor of class I and II histone deacetylases and shows great anticancer activity in a variety of human cancers including breast cancer. In this study, we found that VPA significantly inhibited cell migration but not proliferation of human breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cells. Mechanistic studies found that VPA significantly inhibited the expression of Survivin. Knockdown of Survivin could obviously inhibited cell migration, while over-expression of Survivin markedly rescued the inhibition of VPA on cell migration. Further studies found that knockdown of HDAC2 completely mimicked the effects of VPA on Survivin and cell migration, and over-expression of Survivin could also rescue the effects of HDAC2 knockdown on cell migration. Collectively, these results indicated that HDAC2 may be the specific target of VPA in breast cancer cells, and specific inhibition of HDAC2, especially by small molecular chemicals may lead to less side-effects and provide a better strategy than VPA application for human breast cancer treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available