4.6 Article

Butylated hydroxyanisole inhibits the growth of HeLa cervical cancer cells via caspase-dependent apoptosis and GSH depletion

Journal

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 349, Issue 1-2, Pages 179-186

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11010-010-0672-6

Keywords

Butylated hydroxyanisole; Apoptosis; HeLa; Caspase; ROS; GSH

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science & Technology (MoST)/Korea Science & Engineering Foundation (KOSEF) through the Diabetes Research Center at Chonbuk National University [2010-0029497]
  2. Korean Government (MEST) [2010-0021808]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2010-0029497, 2010-0021808] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA), a synthetic antioxidant is commonly used as a preservative in food and pharmaceutical agents. Despite the assumed low toxicity of BHA, it exerts a variety of effects on tissues and cell functions. In this study, the authors investigated the effects of BHA on the growth inhibition and death of HeLa cervical cancer cells. Dose-dependent inhibition of cell growth was observed with an IC50 of approximately 150 mu M BHA at 24 h. In addition, this agent-induced apoptosis, which was accompanied by the loss of mitochondrial membrane potential (Delta Psi(m)) and caspase activation. Caspase-3 and -8 inhibitors markedly rescued HeLa cells from BHA-induced cell death. In addition, BHA decreased intracellular ROS levels in HeLa cells whereas it increased O-2(center dot-) levels among ROS. The number of glutathione (GSH)-depleted cells was increased in 150 mu M BHA-treated cells, which was attenuated by caspase inhibitors. In conclusion, BHA inhibited the growth of HeLa cells via caspase-dependent apoptosis, which seemed to be related to increase in GSH depletion and O-2(center dot-) level.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available