4.5 Review

High efficiency versus maximal performance - The cause of oxidative stress in eukaryotes: A hypothesis

Journal

MITOCHONDRION
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages 1-6

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mito.2012.11.005

Keywords

Cytochrome c oxidase (COX); Proton pumping; Protein phosphorylation; Oxidative phosphorylation; Reactive oxygen species; Oxidative stress

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [DFG Ka 192/40-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Degenerative diseases are in part based on elevated production of ROS (reactive oxygen species) in mitochondria, mainly during stress and excessive work under stress (strenuous exercise). The production of ROS increases with increasing mitochondrial membrane potential (Delta Psi m). A mechanism is described which is suggested to keep Delta Psi m at low values under normal conditions thus preventing ROS formation, but is switched off under stress and excessive work to maximize the rate of ATP synthesis, accompanied by decreased efficiency. Low Delta Psi m and low ROS production are suggested to occur by inhibition of respiration at high [ATP]/[ADP] ratios. The nucleotides interact with phosphorylated cytochrome c oxidase (COX), representing the step with the highest flux-control coefficient of mitochondrial respiration. At stress and excessive work neural signals are suggested to dephosphorylate the enzyme and abolish the control of COX activity (respiration) by the [ATP]/[ADP] ratio with consequent increase of Delta Psi m and ROS production. The control of COX by the [ATP]/[ADP] ratio, in addition, is proposed to increase the efficiency of ATP production via a third proton pumping pathway, identified in eukaryotic but not in prokaryotic COX. We conclude that 'oxidative stress' occurs when the control of COX activity by the [ATP]/[ADP] ratio is switched off via neural signals. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. and Mitochondria Research Society. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available